World Cup 2026: FIFA forced to reverse language policy after Hakimi incident

Share This Article:
World Cup 2026

FIFA has been forced to backtrack on its controversial language policy for 2026 World Cup press conferences after a series of awkward exchanges involving high-profile players triggered widespread criticism online.

Policy Backlash During Opening Days of Tournament

The issue emerged in the early stages of the competition when journalists were reportedly instructed to ask questions only in English or in the official languages of the teams involved. The decision drew confusion from many observers, particularly given that one of the host nations, Mexico, is a Spanish-speaking country.

Hakimi Incident Sparks Online Reaction

One of the most widely discussed moments involved Morocco captain Achraf Hakimi ahead of his team’s clash with Brazil. The defender, who is fluent in multiple languages including Spanish, appeared ready to engage with a Spanish-speaking journalist before the exchange was interrupted due to the absence of interpretation services.

The clip quickly spread across social media, with fans praising Hakimi’s multilingual ability while questioning FIFA’s restrictions.

“This dude is ultra cultured, speaks four languages: Arabic, Spanish, French, English and all perfect,” one user wrote on X.

Another added: “What a weird idea not to allow questions in the language of one of the hosting countries.”

Vinicius Jr and Frenkie de Jong Also Caught in Debate

Similar confusion was seen during Brazil’s media duties, where Vinicius Jr encouraged a journalist to continue speaking in Spanish before officials stepped in. Netherlands midfielder Frenkie De Jong was also mentioned in discussions surrounding the growing criticism of the policy.

FIFA Forced Into Policy U-Turn

Following the backlash, FIFA has now adjusted its approach. According to AFP, as cited by Mundo Deportivo, Spanish interpretation services have been added to official World Cup press conference operations.

The decision has been widely interpreted as a response to mounting pressure from journalists, fans, and football figures who questioned the practicality and inclusivity of the original policy.

Broader Debate Over Language and Representation

What began as a logistical issue has since developed into a wider conversation about communication, accessibility, and cultural representation at football’s biggest tournament, with many arguing that global events should reflect the linguistic diversity of their hosts and participants.