Sharks v All Blacks: Have your say on Matthew Carley’s refereeing

The Greatest Rivalry Tour meeting between the Sharks and New Zealand is over in Durban – but the debate over England referee Matthew Carley’s performance is only beginning.

Carley was responsible for managing a contest played at the highest level of the game, where the pace is relentless and the pressure is constant. With the crowd closely following every decision, the referee’s interpretation of key moments can have a significant influence on the way a match develops.

Now we want to know how you assessed his performance.

Did Matthew Carley make consistent decisions throughout the game? Was he able to allow the match to flow, or were there moments when his calls interrupted the contest? Were there any decisions that made you raise your eyebrows?

The referee’s role is never straightforward in a match involving the Sharks and the All Blacks. Players are operating at speed, incidents can unfold in an instant and officials must make judgements under intense scrutiny. Every decision is examined by supporters, players and coaches, particularly when the game is finely balanced.

That makes your view an important part of the post-match discussion.

Use the comments section below to rate the referee and explain how you thought Matthew Carley handled the occasion in Durban. You can assess the consistency of his decisions, the way he managed the tempo of the game and the overall effect of his officiating on the contest.

Whether you felt Carley kept control effectively or believe there were calls that deserved closer examination, we want to hear your perspective. Your feedback will help shape the conversation around the match and highlight the influence officials can have on a game of this level.

The focus is now on the man in the middle. After the Sharks and New Zealand have completed their Greatest Rivalry Tour clash, the stage is yours to deliver a verdict on Matthew Carley.

Rate the referee below and tell us how you saw his performance.