Former Manchester United player Peter Schmeichel has raised questions about the club’s choice to sign Antony over Mohammed Kudus. The scrutiny comes as the two players, former teammates at Ajax under current Manchester United coach Erik Ten Hag, have pursued distinct paths since their time in the Dutch club.
Schmeichel’s critique is centered on their respective performances since joining English football, with a particular focus on Kudus’ standout debut season in the Premier League.
The Ghanaian midfielder has distinguished himself by netting an impressive 10 goals across all competitions, while Antony continues to grapple with form-related challenges.
The former Ajax teammates found themselves on opposing sides in West Ham’s recent 2-0 victory over Manchester United, where Kudus not only scored a brilliant goal but also outshone Antony, whose performance was rated as subpar.
Schmeichel expressed his surprise at Coach Ten Hag’s decision, questioning the preference for Antony over Kudus.
“There is something about this boy [Kudus]; he is special. I don’t understand if he [Ten Hag] knows these boys very well, why did he choose Antony over Kudus?” Schmeichel pondered, emphasizing the distinctive qualities that Kudus brings to the pitch.
Kudus has seamlessly established himself as a key player for West Ham, playing a pivotal role in the team’s successes.
With six league goals and a total of ten since his arrival in August, he currently stands just three goals behind West Ham’s top scorer, Jarrod Bowen.
As Schmeichel’s inquiry gains attention, it sparks discussions among football enthusiasts about the factors influencing player choices and the dynamics that shape their performances in different environments.
The contrasting trajectories of Antony and Kudus since their Ajax days add an intriguing layer to the narrative, inviting speculation about the decision-making processes within the world of football transfers.
