The 2025 FIFA Club World Cup was a stern test for Africa’s finest, as all four representatives — Mamelodi Sundowns (South Africa), Al Ahly (Egypt), Esperance de Tunis (Tunisia), and Wydad Casablanca (Morocco) — exited at the group stage. Despite the on-field setbacks, the tournament delivered financial rewards and flashes of promise, although much remains to be improved
Mamelodi Sundowns – Narrow Miss
Of the four African sides, Mamelodi Sundowns came closest to reaching the knockout phase. The South African champions began with a tight 1-0 win over Ulsan HD before losing a pulsating encounter 4-3 to Borussia Dortmund. They needed a win in their final match against Fluminense but were held to a goalless draw, finishing third in the group with four points — just one short of qualification. Nonetheless, they were the top African earners, taking home USD 12.5 million (USD 9.5 million participation fee plus USD 3 million in performance bonuses).
Al Ahly – Wasteful in Key Moments
Al Ahly, the continent’s most successful club, once again underdelivered on the world stage. They drew 0-0 with Inter Miami, squandering a penalty and several chances, followed by a 2-0 loss to Palmeiras. A thrilling 4-4 draw with FC Porto capped their campaign, reflecting a blend of attacking flair and defensive frailties. They finished with USD 11.5 million in prize money but will rue their missed opportunities.
Esperance – High Point, Then a Fall
Esperance’s campaign was a mix of highs and lows. They opened with a 2-0 defeat to Flamengo, then shocked many by beating Los Angeles FC 1-0. However, a heavy 3-0 loss to Chelsea ended their run. Their lone victory provided a silver lining, but their inconsistency and attacking struggles were evident. Like Al Ahly, they pocketed USD 11.5 million in total.
Wydad Casablanca – A Tough Reality Check
Wydad endured the toughest tournament among the African sides, losing all three matches — 2-0 to Manchester City, 4-1 to Juventus, and 2-1 to Al Ain — and finishing without a point. Unlike their counterparts, they failed to earn performance bonuses, walking away with the USD 9.5 million base fee. Their showing laid bare the gap between domestic dominance and global competitiveness.
Conclusion: Money Earned, Lessons Learned
While African clubs failed to advance beyond the group stage, the financial rewards were significant — over USD 45 million in total. This influx has the potential to bolster infrastructure, youth development, and club sustainability if used strategically.
Yet, the sporting shortfall was glaring. From tactical missteps to squad depth limitations, the continent’s representatives were often second-best.
If African clubs are to close the gap on the global stage, meaningful investment, technical upgrades, and long-term planning are crucial.
The journey ended early, but the message is clear: Africa must rise, not just participate.