Michel Platini, the president of UEFA, addressed several topics in an interview with Ouest-France. Key points from his interview include his perspective on video technology in football:
- Offside Calls:
- Platini considers offside calls the only complicated aspect where video assistance might be needed.
- He expresses skepticism, suggesting that even with video, determining offside situations can be challenging.
- Use of Video Technology:
- Platini argues against extensive use of video technology in football, particularly for subjective decisions like fouls.
- He highlights the complexity of implementing technology for offside situations, as it would require additional cameras and monitoring systems.
- Cost is a significant factor, with estimates indicating a substantial financial burden for implementing technology on the goal line.
- Cost Implications:
- Platini emphasizes the financial aspect, stating that incorporating technology on the goal line would be expensive.
- He contrasts the cost of technology with the existing expenses for referees, suggesting a significant financial burden for football organizations.
- Referees and Video Arbitration:
- Platini reveals his opposition to video arbitration, attributing the push for it to television networks seeking financial gain.
- He argues that introducing video technology on the goal line could open the door to broader video usage in football, a development he opposes.
- Penalty Decisions:
- Platini suggests that, in the penalty area, a yellow card coupled with a penalty could be sufficient, advocating for a change in the current rules.
- He points out that the resistance to change primarily comes from the International Board.
In summary, Platini is against widespread use of video technology in football, particularly for subjective decisions, and emphasizes the associated costs and potential negative impacts on the game. He also suggests alternative measures, such as modifying penalty rules.
