FIFA denies paying Infantino a second salary, rejects disclosure allegations

Share This Article:
FIFA denies paying Infantino a second salary, rejects disclosure allegations

FIFA has strongly denied claims that its president received an undeclared salary, responding to an investigation by the Times that questioned the transparency of football’s governing body.

In a statement, the organization said it “strongly rejects any accusation that it has failed to disclose financial information and violated the Statute of the Federation.” It insisted that its financial reporting is sound and that it has met its obligations.

The statement addressed the position of President Gianni Infantino directly. “FIFA does not pay a second salary to the president of FIFA and respects all reporting obligations related to remuneration,” the organization said.

It added that “the annual salary of the FIFA president, as well as other contractual benefits, are determined by the independent subcommittee for salaries.”

FIFA also defended its accounting practices. According to the statement, “FIFA accounts are subject to independent auditing and all declarations comply with the tax regulations in force in Switzerland, the United States and other countries.”

The mention of several jurisdictions appears aimed at countering any suggestion that the organization has fallen short of its legal duties in the countries where it operates.

The Times investigation centers on an alleged undeclared salary. FIFA’s response makes clear it considers the claims unfounded, and it pointed to its independent salary-setting process as the safeguard against any improper payments.

The timing is notable. FIFA said it is “focused on Thursday’s Council meeting and looks forward to discussions with its members to promote the further growth of this sport after the most successful World Championships in history.”

The comment suggests the organization wants attention to return to its sporting and organizational agenda rather than the controversy.

Governance and financial transparency have long been sensitive issues for FIFA. The organization has faced scrutiny over how it manages money and compensates its leaders, and it has repeatedly stressed independent oversight and compliance as part of its reforms.

It remains to be seen whether the Times report will raise questions among FIFA’s member associations when the Council meets Thursday.

For now, the organization’s position is firm: no second salary exists, and its reporting meets all required standards.