The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has moved to significantly tighten its confidentiality rules, introducing a strict disciplinary framework that could see current or former employees fined up to $50,000 for leaking internal information, even if the breach occurs as late as five years after leaving office.
The decision forms part of CAF’s broader efforts to protect its administrative and organisational data and to curb the unauthorised circulation of sensitive documents.
Particular emphasis has been placed on information linked to closed meetings, disciplinary cases and strategic decisions that could affect the federation’s public image or institutional stability.
According to a report by Al Akhbar newspaper, Nigerian journalist Osasu Obayiuwana revealed the existence of an official CAF document confirming the adoption of the new procedure. The policy is reportedly inspired by the model used by FIFA in handling sensitive internal matters.
The document underlines the obligation of absolute silence and full confidentiality, stressing that no internal details should be disclosed under any circumstances or for any reason.
The same report noted that the document reflects CAF’s intention to impose sweeping restrictions on anyone who has worked within the organisation.
This includes administrative staff, technical officials, and former committee members to prevent behind-the-scenes discussions and decision-making processes from reaching the public domain, particularly in sensitive cases.
The confidentiality clause has regained prominence in the aftermath of the controversial events surrounding the Africa Cup of Nations final hosted by Morocco. It was during the intense internal meetings that followed, involving CAF leadership and the Disciplinary Committee, that concerns reportedly grew over the potential leakage of accurate and sensitive information to the media or external parties at what was described as a critical moment.
The move is expected to generate considerable debate across African media and sporting circles. While some view the measure as a necessary step to safeguard the organisation and enforce internal discipline, others argue that it is overly restrictive and could be used to suppress the exposure of wrongdoing.
What is clear, however, is that CAF has chosen a hardline approach, opting for severe financial penalties as a deterrent against any breach of its confidentiality rules.
